Document Description: This document captures different potential use cases and ideation for use cases collected by the team and the wider community.

The proposal inverter was initially conceptualised as: “The proposal inverter is a funding primitive that enables multiple groups or individuals to collaborate on common proposals, inverting the typical Proposal/DAO relationship to facilitate cross-DAO initiatives, such as co-funding shared research.” [1]

Use Cases:

• DAO/Researcher initiated R&D initiatives of independent parties
  • E.g. DAO 1 & DAO2 & DAO3 want work X to be done
• Shared operations [domain-agnostic] (Marketing, Business Development, Process documentation)
  • DAO1 & DAO2 & DAO3 are similar in mission (e.g. OpenScience) and share their marketing operations while staying independent in their research departments for instance
• Reach out to Ecosystem:
  • Anything that has to do with joint treasuries:
    • Co-investments/acquisitions,
    • Decisions that affect (predefined) collaborations
    • Planned Liquidity Pool coordinations as part of a coordinated promotion.
    • Cross DAO access to features that require agreed qualification criteria.
      • Subscription model
  • Ultimately depends on
    • 1. the nature of the underlying DAO (types).
    • 2. Scope of collaboration (as a result of 1 above)

Open & Answer Questions:

• Why does the minimum horizon have to be set? Does it acts essentially as some sort of cut of date where everything is paid out
• Can multiple coins be thrown in the proposal inverter (i.e. $PRIME, $USDC, $MAKER)?

Sources:

[1] https://medium.com/primedao/exploring-dao2dao-collaboration-mechanisms-c37218a17a21